Jump to content
  • Biodiversity at high risk in Prince George TSA, Forest Practices Board reports

    Michelle Connolly

    Conservationists call for a moratorium on primary forest logging in the Prince George TSA following a scathing report by the Forest Practices Board.



    A large clearcut in the Prince George Timber Supply area. Photo by Sean ORourke/Conservation North


    CONSERVATION NORTH is calling for a moratorium on industrial logging in the Prince George Timber Supply Area following the release of an investigative report by the Forest Practices Board (“the Board”). The Board concluded that biodiversity is at high risk in the vast majority of landscape units within the Prince George and Stewart-Nechako Natural Resource Districts and has recommended that old growth be promptly mapped and protected where it is most threatened by industrial logging.

    The Board’s investigation was elicited by complaints from the public.

    “We view this as an indictment of industrial forestry practices in our region. The only way the government of BC actually manages biodiversity is by keeping the activities of licensees in check. They have failed to do this,” asserts Jenn Matthews, outreach coordinator with volunteer-based Conservation North.

    While the Board’s report concludes that licensees are complying with the current legal requirements of the Biodiversity Order (“the Order”) for the region, more importantly it states that the Order is out of date such that even full compliance results in the unsustainable loss of critical wildlife habitat.

    This is the second time in 2020 that an independent analysis has pointed out that effects of industrial forestry in the Prince George region have been irredeemably harmful to nature. The first instance was the Last Stand report, which was prepared by scientists and identified areas across the province that are hotspots of biodiversity loss due to logging of primary forest.

    Despite their strong recommendations aimed at the BC government, the Board report seems to gloss over the negative effects of a peculiar legal loophole that is built into the Order.

    According to Sean O’Rourke, who runs Conservation North’s field program: “the Order allows licensees to submit something called an old growth ‘recruitment strategy’ which is basically an ‘IOU’ to the government for old growth that doesn’t exist yet. A licensee will draw a line around a patch of 60-year old trees and promise that patch will get old one day.”

    Put another way, licensees are using recruitment strategies as giant loopholes through which to log remaining old growth by setting aside younger forests as potential future old growth. Recruitment strategies are fraudulent because they allow licensees to circumvent the intent of the Biodiversity Order. Unfortunately, Prince George has a district manager who has been signing off on them left and right.

    “This report makes it clear that there are terminal problems with how licensees are operating in the PG TSA. Industrial-scale logging must be put on hold until the recommendations of the Board report are fully implemented,” asserts Ms. Matthews.

    In the PG TSA, the work of keeping track of what has been logged and how much old growth remains is left to a group made up of licensees, as opposed to an independent body or the BC government. Conservation North views this arrangement as a serious conflict of interest that needs to be rectified if there is to be any hope of protecting wildlife in the long term.

    In addition to mapping and protecting old growth immediately, Conservation North also supports the Forest Practices Board’s second recommendation for an update of the targets in the Order, with the strong caveat that it must be done by independent scientists, and without the influence of licensees.

    Michelle Connolly, MSc, is a director of Conservation North.

    The Forest Practices Board’s investigative report: Forest Practices Board report on risk to biodiversity in Prince George TSA.pdf

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Massive loopholes in the cutting permit issuance side of our government with lots of fraudulent work being done to expedite this process. All under the guise of licensed professionals making sure everything is okay. I am so tired on yet another report proving that the chief forester's office is complicit. Coming from the chief who heads up our ethics leadership I want to both laugh and puke at the same time. How can our new Minister of Forests support this? Because like all before her and all BC’s executive- big business entirely owns them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you look at at Lidar image ( think X-ray 3d) image of a 60 year old second growth plantation, its essentially one colour grey. No variation in tone or distinction of trees. The same type image of an old growth canopy shows white mushroom clouds of tree tops interspersed with ground, grey. The difference is very extreme so, how could anyone in their right mind call these two things equal as old growth or biodiversity? That would be very stupid. Just ask any black bear specialist,  they've known about OG den loss for decades.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

  • Create New...